Did the Apostle Peter Ever Go to Rome? Part II

The Catholic Church boasts that their Church is validated by post-apostolic “doctors of the Church” and history and archaeology, etc., etc., yet the most famous historian in Rome who lived from 37 AD to 101 AD is Josephus and HE NEVER MENTIONED PETER IN ROME. 
Was Peter ever the ruler of the church? Of any church any time, any place? Not that anybody knows of. The pastor and leader of the church at Jerusalem was James, the Lord’s brother (Acts_12:171513-2121:18;Gal_2:9.) This Scriptural account of James is confirmed by Josephus in his Antiquities XX, 9,1, where James’ martyrdom is described. Josephus never heard of Simon Peter, but the Jewish historian knows all about the faithful pastor and leader of the Christian church in Jerusalem.
Roman Catholicism says Peter was the the bishop at Rome from 42 A.D. to 67 A.D, when he was crucified under Nero.
What we have here if Peter was in Rome during those years, is that the New Testament is not reliable.
Sometime during those days Peter made his missionary journey through the western part of Judea, to Lydda, to Joppa, to Caesarea, and back to Jerusalem (Acts 9, 10, 11). Then came the imprisonment under Herod Agrippa I and the miraculous deliverance by the angel of the Lord (Acts 12). Peter then “went down from Judea to Caesarea and there abode” (Acts 12:19). Herod Agrippa died not long after these events (Acts 12:20-23). Josephus says that the death of Agrippa occurred in the fourth year of the reign of Claudius. This would be about 45 A.D., and Peter is still in Palestine.
1. Peter returns the visit and goes to Antioch where Paul is working. This occasioned the famous interview between the two recorded in Galatians 2:11-14Peter is still in the Orient, not in Rome.
2. After 54 A.D., and after the Antioch visit, the Apostle Peter makes an extensive missionary journey or journeys throughout the Roman provinces of the East. On these missionary tours Peter takes his wife (I Cor. 9:5). They labor in Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia. This must have taken several years since this is a large territory and a larger work/ministry. This would take us, therefore, to at least 60 A.D., and Peter and his wife are still not in Rome but in the East.
3. In about 58 A.D. Paul wrote a letter to the church at Rome. In the last chapter of that epistle, Paul salutes twenty-seven persons, but he never mentions Simon Peter. If Peter was “governing” the church at Rome, why doesn’t Paul mention Peter?
Romans 1:13 shows that the church at Rome was a Gentile church. At the Jerusalem conference (Gal. 2:9), it was agreed that Peter should go to the Jews and Paul to the Gentiles.
The gospel ministry of Paul was motivated  by a statement he makes in Romans 15:20“Yea, so have I strived to preach the gospel, not where Christ was named, lest I should build upon another man’s foundation.” Something similar he repeats in I Corinthians 10:15,16. Having written this to the brethren at Rome, it would have been contradictory for Paul to go to Rome if Peter were already there, or had been there for years.
4. Paul’s first Roman imprisonment took place about 60 A.D. to 64 A.D. from his prison the Apostle to the Gentiles wrote four letters – EphesiansPhilippiansColossiansPhilemon. In these letters he mentions many of his fellow Christians who are in the city, but he never once refers to Simon Peter.
5. Paul’s second Roman imprisonment brought him martyrdom. This occurred about 67 A.D. Just before he died Paul wrote a letter to Timothy, our “II Timothy.” In that final letter the apostle mentions many people but plainly says that “only Luke is with me.” There is never a reference to Peter.
I have now covered the years of 42 A.D. to 67 A.D., the years Peter is supposed to have been the prince and bishop and ruler of the church at Rome. Yet, there is not even a “peep” that this suggestion is even remotely true. The New Testament denies such fictitious stories.
Peter was never in Rome. Nor was he ruler over any church. Nor did he have any keys to give to anybody else to hand down to others. He was a stone, one out of many with which God is building His spiritual house in earth and in heaven.

Did the Apostle Peter Ever Go to Rome? Part I

Ok, let’s trace Peter’s movement with the Scriptures. Certain dates and events militate against the supposition that Peter was ever in Rome.

33 A.D. The Church was established on Pentecost in Jerusalem and Peter was there – he preached that day (Acts 2).

36 A.D.  Paul was converted on the road to Damascus (Acts 9).
             1. Acts 9:22-25 together with II Corinthians 11:32 tells us that King Aretas collaborated with the                    Jews of Damascus who tried to capture Paul, but he was “Let down from window over the 
                 wall in a basket” and escaped.
             2. With the reign of Aretas, the date of Paul’s conversion cannot be earlier than 36 or 38 and 
                 certainly not later than 40 because Aretas’ reign ended in 40 A. D.

39 A.D. Herod died “eaten of worms” (Acts 12:23).
             1. But Peter and James were imprisoned by this same Heron in Jerusalem shortly before his 
                 death (Acts 12:1-2).
             2. The Lord delivered Peter, and he was restored to the church because “prayers were made 
                 earnestly of the church unto God for him.” (Acts 12:5).

44-48 A.D. The famine prophesied by Agabus, that “would come over all the world: which came to pass in the days of Claudius”  (Acts 11:28)
             1. This famine is also confirmed by secular writers:
                 a. Suetonius (Claud.,xvii)
                 b. Dio Cassius (lx. 11)
                 c. Tacitus (Annals xii.43)
                 d. Orosius (vii. 6)
                 e. Josephus (Ant., XX, ii.5)
             2. These writers also relate the death of Herod in the same period of time. They confirm N.T.  
                 chronology. And Peter was not imprisoned until Acts 12 – which fits this dating.

45-49 A.D. The First Missionary Journey of Paul, Barnabas and John Mark (Acts 13-14).

46-47 A.D. Sergius Paulus was Proconsul of Cyprus – a Roman inscription found on the island confirm 
                  this date.
             1. Annius Bassus became Proconsul in 52 A.D. during the twelfth year of the reign of Claudius 
                 Caesar.
             2. So Sergius Paulus had to be Proconsul before then, which easily fits the date presented for 
                 Paul’s journey. (Acts 13:7)

49-50 A.D. The Edict of Claudius which commanded “all the Jews to depart from Rome” (Acts 18:2 does not necessarily mean that the edict was not issued until the time of Acts 18 in Luke’s reference, but that the edict was the reason Aquila and Priscilla were in Corinth, having “lately come from Italy”).

52-53 A.D. The Jerusalem Conference about the question of Gentile circumcision (Acts 15 and 
Galatians 2:1-10).
                  1. As already noted, Paul’s visit was “three years after” his conversion.
                  2. “Then after the space of fourteen years”, Paul returned “by revelation” (God commanded 
                      him to go) because of the uncircumcision question.
                  3. That makes a total of seventeen years after Paul’s conversion, and it dates the Jerusalem 
                      meeting about 52 or 53 A.D.
                  4. But at that very time: “James, Peter and John were reputed to be pillars in the church” in 
                      Jerusalem (Gal 2:9)

53-54 A.D. Gallio was Proconsul in Corinth – and that date is confirmed by Roman historians and by a 
fragmentary inscription from Delphi containing a letter from the Emperor Claudius in which mention of Gallio was made and it is dated in the twenty-sixth year of his reign.
                  1. Paul was in Corinth at that time (Acts 18:12) during his Second Missionary Journey.
                  2. From Corinth he wrote 1 and II Thessalonians.

54-55 A.D. Paul’s Third Missionary Journey – during which time he spent two years teaching in the school 
of Tyrannus in Ephesus.
                  1. From Ephesus he wrote 1 Corinthians and Galatians.
                  2. He then went to Macedonia from whence he wrote II Corinthians — probably the next year –
                      – about 57 A.D.

58 A.D.     Paul returned to Corinth where he “spent three months” (Acts 20:3).
                 1. From Corinth he wrote the Roman Letter. That hs is in Corinth at this writing is evident from 
                     the fact that ie is the guest of “Gaius, my host” (Romans 16:23). And “Erastus was the 
                     treasurer of the city.” Gaius is the same brother mentioned in I Corinthians 1:14; Acts 
                    19:29.
                 2. In the sixteenth chapter of Romans Paul mentioned some thirty-five different brethren by 
                     name – to whom he sent salutations. But there is no mention of Peter being in Rome – and if  
                     he were there – then Paul totally ignored him. It is easier to believe he simply was not there.

59-60 A.D. Festus succeeded Felix (Acts 24:27) and Eusebius in this book on Church History places 
this succession by Festus during the second year of the reign of Nero.
                  1. Paul had been a prisoner of Felix for almost two years when Festus succeeded him (Acts 
                      24:27).
                  2. Only “three days” after his ascension to office, Festus went to Jerusalem (Acts 25:1) and 
                      the Jews there tried to get him to send Paul to Jerusalem from Caesarea so they could kill 
                      him.
                  3. But he stayed in Jerusalem “not more than eight or ten days” (Acts 25:6). Then the day 
                      after his return to Caesarea he called Paul to stand trial (Acts 25:6).
                  4. It was then that Paul “appealed to Caesar” (Acts 25:11)

61-62 A.D. Paul’s journey to Rome and his first imprisonment, during which time he stayed “in his own 
hired dwelling” for some two years (Acts 28:30).
                  1. During this time he wrote from Rome the book of Colossians.
                      a. Timothy was with him at that time in Rome (Col 1:1)
                      b. Tychicus and Onesimus took the letter he wrote from Rome to Colossae (Col 4:7-9)
                      c. Paul sends greetings from Aristarchus, Mark, Justus, Luke and Demas. (Col 4:10-14)
                      d. No mention of Peter being in Rome.
                  2. From Rome he also wrote Ephesians.
                      a. Tychicus delivered the letter to Ephesus (Eph 6:21)
                      b. No mention of Peter as Pope in the list of church offices listed in Eph 4:11
                         “and he gave some to be apostles, and some prophets, and some evangelists and 
                          some pastors and teachers”, but no popes.
                      c. Peter is not mentioned as being in Rome.
                  3. During this same time he wrote Philemon from Rome.
                      a. Timothy was with him (Philemon 1:1)
                      b. He also sends greeting from Epaphras, Mark, Aristarchus, Demas and Luke (Philemon 
                          23).
                      c. No mention of Peter being in Rome.

63 A.D.   Phillipians was written from Rome during this same period of time. It was written later than those mentioned just above – for time was required for Epaphroditus to be sent from Philippi, to get sick: “nigh unto death” (Phil 2:25-30) and then return to Philippi.
                 1. Timothy was with Paul in Rome (Phil 1:1)                  
                 2. Paul also sends greetings from “the brethren” and “especially they that are of Caesar’s 
                     household” (Phil 4:22).
                 3. No mention of Peter being in Rome.

64-65 A.D. Paul was released from the Roman prison and returned to Greece and Macedonia (I Tim 1:3)
                 1. He wrote I Timothy from Macedonia – see above.
                 2. He also wrote Titus from Macedonia – after he had returned from Crete (Titus 1:5)

65 A.D.(ca) Peter writes from “Babylon” on the Euphrates river – as indicated by the statement: “She that                       is in Babylon saluteth you.” (I Peter 5:13).
                 1. There was a strong Jewish colony in Babylon at that time and Peter “had been entrusted 
                     with the gospel of the circumcision.” (Gal 2:7)
                 2. Since Claudius had commanded “All Jews to depart from Rome (Acts 18:3), it would be 
                     difficult to understand why Peter would go there to carry out his assignment to the Jews.
                 3. There is absolutely no reason to suppose that Peter is speaking symbolically of Rome when 
                     he says “Babylon,” for there is no such symbolic usage until John’s Revelation letter.  
                 4. After 96 A.D., when Revelation was composed, the Imperial City of Rome was symbolically  
                     and classically called “Babylon” by both Christian and secular writers.
                 5. Catholic writers universally say that “Babylon” of I Peter 5:13 is Rome (which it isn’t), 
                     and then generally deny that “Babylon” of Revelation 17:5 is Rome (which it is).

67 A.D.     Paul’s second imprisonment in Rome.
                 1. II Timothy was written during Paul’s final incarceration in Rome.
                     a. He wants Timothy to “come shortly to me (II Tim 4:9)
                     b. He named some: “Demas forsook me…and went to Thessalonica” (II Tim 4:10)
                     c. “Crescens” went to “Galatia” (vs 10).
                     d. “Titus” went to “Dalmatia” (vs. 10).
                     e. “Only Luke is with me (vs.11).
                     f. “Erastus remained at Corinth” (vs. 20).
                     g. “Trophimus I left at Miletus sick” (vs. 20).
                 2. He sends some salutations:
                     a. “Eubulus saluteth thee, and Pudens, and Linus, and Claudia” (vs. 21).
                     b. No salutation from Peter — and no mention of him being in Rome.
                 3. If Peter was there he must have abandoned Paul, for “This thou knowest, that all that are in 
                     Asia turned away from me, of which are Phygelus and Hermogenes.” (II Tim 1:15)
                 4. “Only Luke is with me” – He stayed with Paul, and so did “Onesiphorus, for he oft refreshed 
                     me, and was not ashamed of my chain: but when he was in Rome, he sough me diligently 
                     and found me” (II Tim 1:16-17).

67 A.D.     Peter writes the second epistle — II Peter and it has the same tone as the first epistle, it must have been written to the same Jewish Christians “of the dispersion in Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia and Bithynia” (I Peter 1:1)
                 1. The geography of the brethren to whom Peter wrote places them in the region of Asia and 
                     Asia Minor – close to national Babylon!
                 2. Paul was in Europe and wrote to European churches.
                 3. John was in Asia and wrote the “letters to the seven churches in Asia.” (Rev 2-3)

From this point in history, all inspired or even secular history about either Paul or Peter comes to an end. The next mention of Peter’s whereabouts will not appear for another eighty years. And for uninspired writers, whose writings are critically rejected for other reasons, their suggestion that he was in Rome leaves much doubt about their reliability.

All history of Peter’s travels in the New Testament do not place him in Rome, but definitely place him elsewhere.

So Peter’s definite location in too many other definite locations at too many other defnite times definitely exclude the possibility that he spent 25 years in Rome or even went there in the first place.

Mueller Report Will Shroud the Truth

By Sydney Powell

sydneypowell.com

MUELLER REPORT WILL SHROUD THE TRUTH: Corrupt Cabal Began Illegal Spying on Trump in 2015

The Mueller Report will try very hard to shroud the real issues–which are:  WHY, WHERE, WHEN, HOW, and BY WHOM did the spying on Mr. Trump and his associates begin?  From all information available so far, per Comey’s own admissions, there was never a legal or factual basis to begin any investigation of anyone associated with Mr. Trump, and they never verified a word of the “Steele dossier.”   The evidence so far exposes a significant group in the CIA, FBI, DOJ, DOD, and State Department, who manufactured the entire counter-intelligence operation from thin air.   It’s smoke tied with baling wire. That is a bombshell from which Mr. Mueller and Mr. Weissmann must distract.

The long-awaited Report will doubtlessly contain a lot of assertions about Russian troll farms–like the unprecedented charges in the Concord indictment that came mostly from an article in a Russian magazine–combined with claims and much jibberish that it was Russians who hacked the DNC.  It will ignore all the work of relentless reporter Luke Rosiak who has fully documented the nefarious work of the Pakistani Awan brothers–abject criminals to whom Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz and at least three dozen Congressional Democrats gave the keys to the kingdom of the DNC and our national intelligence on the Hill.  It will ignore the work of the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community and the Inspector General of Congress–both of whom documented exposure of our national secrets by the Awan brothers and Mrs. Clinton, respectively.  It will also ignore the irrefutable fact that if the FBI and DNC really wanted to determine who hacked the DNC, the DNC would have turned over the servers to the FBI–or the FBI would have seized them as it does when it purports to conduct a real investigation as opposed to a sham or a cover-up.

The Truth will be found in documents the Mueller Report avoids–the documents all the real criminals created when they thought they would never be caught and they would “stop” Trump.  We must have the original documents declassified and disclosed to the public to the maximum extent possible.  This includes, for starters, the 99-page decision of the FISA court in which Chief Judge Rosemary Collyer excoriated the FBI and the NSA for their abuses of the entire surveillance system and tools.

Significantly, this decision reveals that FBI Director Comey and FBI lawyers gave illegal unsupervised access to three private contractors to mine the NSA database.  I’ve said for two years I’d bet money one of those redacted names is FusionGPS.  It goes back at least as far as 2015, and it is no coincidence that Nellie Ohr, who also worked for CIA Director John Brennan, went to work for FusionGPS in 2015.  She has admitted to Congress that she was “researching” the Trump family and General Flynn among others. This also contributed to the huge spike in “unmaskings” and improper searches of the database by Obama operatives in 2016.

Mr. President, within the next few weeks, please declassify the following documents as much as possible.  The public is entitled to the Truth, and even though Mr. Mueller and his hitsquad of Trump-haters found no collusion and no obstruction, the Mueller report will be Mr. Weissmann’s narrative of what they want the public to believe.  It will not be the Truth.  The American people need to see the actual documents that reveal the most heinous abuse of power and fraud ever perpetrated on the Republic.  This includes:

  1. The FISC decision with far fewer redactions, including the names of the private contractors Comey let mine the NSA database for their own gain and political opposition research
  2. All of Comey’s many memos of the FBI’s corrupt scheme
  3. All Bruce Ohr 302s
  4. The Justice Department IG should take immediate steps to secure and preserve the cell phones and computers of all members of the SCO and treat them as evidence in a criminal case–especially in light of their destruction of Strzok’s and Page’s SCO cell phones after being notified of their egregious bias as shown in text messages.  They contain Brady evidence as to Flynn and Manafort and Stone.
  5. The original EC [Electronic Communication] Brennan and Strzok created that supposedly began this
  6. All FISA applications including all applications which were denied as to anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign
  7. Evidence of all payments from the FBI through DOD to Stephan Halper, Mifsud, Downer, and payments by the FBI to Christopher Steele.
  8. Authorization and communications with CGHQ and other Five-Eyes members to spy on the Trump campaign and administration
  9. All transcripts of all witnesses who testified before Congress and are still being withheld
  10. The full and unredacted text messages and emails between Strzok and Page
  11. The original FBI 302 of General Michael Flynn, the 1-A file and all drafts and notes.
  12. Evidence and notes of the back-channel meeting between McCabe, Strzok and Vice-President Pence about General Flynn
  13. All information, notes, 302s, of DOJ Attorneys Ahmad and Weissmann’s interactions with Christopher Steele, Bruce Ohr, Nellie Ohr, and the FBI on the Steele dossier and related issues surrounding the FISA applications
  14. Obama White House logs during the transition in 2015-6 identifying meetings with reporters like Ignatius, Corn, Isikoff,  and others pushing Russia fraud
  15. Names of reporters paid by FusionGPS to push the Russia collusion lie
  16. All documentation, notes, reports of the FBI morning briefing in January 2016 in which McCabe avowed: “First we fuck Flynn, then we fuck Trump.”
  17. Instructions to Halper to set up General Flynn with the Russian woman and anything else about Halper’s role in the cabal; the same for Misfud and Downer
  18. All evidence of who leaked the conversation of General Flynn with the Russian ambassador
  19. Evidence or information regarding the head of the DOD Office of Assessment handling and paying Halper for the FBI and meeting regularly with David Ignatius
  20. All the paperwork targeting General Flynn with a FARA investigation as soon as he was named to Trump’s administration
  21. Rosenstein’s authorizations to Mueller
  22. And, at a minimum, the Inspector General must secure any and all messages between Mueller, Weissmann, Comey, McCabe, Yates, and Rosenstein or any combination thereof regarding “special counsel,” Trump, Page, Manafort, Papadopoulos, Steele, Flynn, or any member of the Trump campaign from 2015 to the present.

Not only do the American people have a right to know the Truth, but the only way to restore integrity to and trust in the Department of Justice and the FBI is to expose and hold accountable under the law everyone who played a role in perpetrating the greatest fraud ever against our courts, the Rule of Law, a presidential candidate and President, the American people, and everything for which this Republic stands.

My edit: So glad, General Flynn has Sydney Powell on his side, now. She is a genuine “Steel Magnolia”!